What if Medical Residencies were not funded by Medicare?

Da Bears and other important distractions...

Moderators: Adminnaoum, flipsoid

What if Medical Residencies were not funded by Medicare?

Postby CaribMD » Mon May 18, 2015 8:20 pm

One of the problems with funding new medical residencies is that they are funded through congress approving medicare money for them. What if this was stopped and the funding came out of the general fund? What if congress just directly through a Bill just funded residencies eliminating the expenditure from the now broke Medicare system? I believe it could be and should be done. They could then have the number of residencies we need in the USA.
User avatar
CaribMD
The One
The One
 
Posts: 7690
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Moderator Land

Re: What if Medical Residencies were not funded by Medicare?

Postby Christian_Larsen » Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:49 pm

I'm not an economist or anything; but, won't the cost of funding the residencies be the same? Would people still be hired to administer the payments as well?
Christian_Larsen
Scutophile
Scutophile
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 1:45 pm

Re: What if Medical Residencies were not funded by Medicare?

Postby jamescreswell » Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:40 am

I think, your thought is absolutely correct, but it is not profitably for a special group of people. As I understand, the system is legal and particular sum of money can be spend on "other things", if you know what I mean. Of course, it would be better if there would be more neurology residency, for example. But, I think it is nearly impossible in the near future.
jamescreswell
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:37 am

Return to OT - Off topic discussions